A deterministic, bit-accurate golden reference model for a probabilistic-bit
sampler datapath — with a full chain of custody. Configure the hardware, sample against the
exact Boltzmann distribution, inspect every number, download the receipt, and score a
device's own sample stream for pass/fail. All computed live in your browser.
Deterministic: same seed → identical result. This is the audit anchor.
datapath bit-cost
—
B Sample & score vs exact Boltzmann
✓Samples correctly
Total-variation distance
0.000
KL( sampled ‖ exact )
0.000
exact Boltzmann P(state)hardware-model sampleslower strip = residual (sampled − exact) per state
Field MAC
Q_.8
hᵢ+ΣJ s
× 2β
temperature
scale to z
Sigmoid LUT
2^6 x 12b
p=σ(z)
Stochastic cmp
LFSR 16b
u<p ? +1:−1
Spin out
1 bit
block-parallel
provenance
Chain of custody
All randomness here is intentional and seeded
— any other nondeterminism is a bug. A stochastic sampler is only verifiable if the only thing
that varies is the thing you asked to vary: same seed in, byte-identical result out, every time. The
record below is the exact provenance of every number on this page, and the receipt is downloadable.
C Run record & receipt
D Raw numbers — top states by probability
Every value below is what produced the metrics above — nothing summarized away.
state
bits
exact P
sampled P
count
residual
acceptance test
Score a device's samples
E Device-under-test ingest — the hardware slot
This is where real hardware plugs in. Paste a sample stream
(state indices 0–255, any separators) from an RTL sim, an emulator, or — with access —
the TSU itself, and the harness scores it against the exact reference: pass/fail, distribution
distance, and per-spin marginals showing where it deviates.
(Exact ground truth is enumerable here because the model is small. At scale you can't enumerate 2^N —
you verify the same way on marginals and the conditional P(sᵢ=+1 | field)=σ(2βf); same harness.)
What this is
Thermodynamic hardware computes by sampling a Boltzmann distribution in silicon.
Before you can trust the chip you need a bit-accurate software oracle to check it against, plus a study
of how much datapath precision the sampling actually needs. This is that oracle: fixed-point field MAC,
sigmoid LUT, LFSR compare and block-Gibbs update, each modeled as an FPGA/ASIC builds it, scored against
the brute-force-enumerated true distribution — and everything is reproducible from the seed.
Read it like a verification engineer
Drop the fractional bits to ~2 and the sampler produces garbage. Cut the LUT below 5
address bits (interpolation off) and the sigmoid biases every conditional. The headline: this model
samples the correct Boltzmann distribution with only a Q_.6 field, a 32-entry interpolated sigmoid
LUT, and a 16-bit LFSR — a minimum spec that is an area/power number, derived not guessed. The
same LUT and LFSR drive a synthesizable Verilog core that passes 12,864/12,864 self-checking
vectors in Icarus Verilog.